Hi List,
I noticed in Spamassassin bugzilla:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6335
that there are 2 new TLD files available for uses with SURBL: "two-level-tlds" and "three-level-tlds".
However, I am wondering where these files should be placed and if they need to be renamed and have .cf appended to them like the "90_2tld.cf" file URIBL supplies?
Thanks in advance for any guidance or feedback.
Regards,
Bill
Hi!
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6335
that there are 2 new TLD files available for uses with SURBL: "two-level-tlds" and "three-level-tlds".
However, I am wondering where these files should be placed and if they need to be renamed and have .cf appended to them like the "90_2tld.cf" file URIBL supplies?
Thanks in advance for any guidance or feedback.
Yups. If you want to put them inside SpamAssassin you most likely can simply catch http://rulesemporium.com/rules/90_2tld.cf
Bye, Raymond.
On 3/2/2010 5:48 PM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
Hi!
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6335
that there are 2 new TLD files available for uses with SURBL: "two-level-tlds" and "three-level-tlds".
However, I am wondering where these files should be placed and if they need to be renamed and have .cf appended to them like the "90_2tld.cf" file URIBL supplies?
Thanks in advance for any guidance or feedback.
Yups. If you want to put them inside SpamAssassin you most likely can simply catch http://rulesemporium.com/rules/90_2tld.cf
Okay, but that really doesn't make sense, since there are different 2TLD and 3TLD domains listed in the 2 files available for download on the SURBL site. There must be some reason for these files being made available for download and hour sync from SURBL?
Bill
On 3/2/10, Bill Landry bill@inetmsg.com wrote:
On 3/2/2010 5:48 PM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
Hi!
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6335
that there are 2 new TLD files available for uses with SURBL: "two-level-tlds" and "three-level-tlds".
However, I am wondering where these files should be placed and if they need to be renamed and have .cf appended to them like the "90_2tld.cf" file URIBL supplies?
Thanks in advance for any guidance or feedback.
Yups. If you want to put them inside SpamAssassin you most likely can simply catch http://rulesemporium.com/rules/90_2tld.cf
Okay, but that really doesn't make sense, since there are different 2TLD and 3TLD domains listed in the 2 files available for download on the SURBL site. There must be some reason for these files being made available for download and hour sync from SURBL?
Bill
You may need to create new .cf files with our TLD lists. There may be an effort by SA to merge the TLD changes into their TLD data, but we have not heard back yet.
Did you also see the SURBL TLD announcement which has some references:
http://lists.surbl.org/pipermail/announce/2010-February/000202.html
(Everyone reading this, please make sure you are signed up for the SURBL Announce mailing list. Message volume is very low at a few messages per year.)
On 3/3/2010 12:42 AM, Jeff Chan wrote:
On 3/2/10, Bill Landry bill@inetmsg.com wrote:
On 3/2/2010 5:48 PM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
Hi!
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6335
that there are 2 new TLD files available for uses with SURBL: "two-level-tlds" and "three-level-tlds".
However, I am wondering where these files should be placed and if they need to be renamed and have .cf appended to them like the "90_2tld.cf" file URIBL supplies?
Thanks in advance for any guidance or feedback.
Yups. If you want to put them inside SpamAssassin you most likely can simply catch http://rulesemporium.com/rules/90_2tld.cf
Okay, but that really doesn't make sense, since there are different 2TLD and 3TLD domains listed in the 2 files available for download on the SURBL site. There must be some reason for these files being made available for download and hour sync from SURBL?
Bill
You may need to create new .cf files with our TLD lists. There may be an effort by SA to merge the TLD changes into their TLD data, but we have not heard back yet.
Did you also see the SURBL TLD announcement which has some references:
http://lists.surbl.org/pipermail/announce/2010-February/000202.html
No, but thanks for the link.
(Everyone reading this, please make sure you are signed up for the SURBL Announce mailing list. Message volume is very low at a few messages per year.)
I'll subscribe.
I added the two TLD files, added the appropriate "util_rb_2tld" "util_rb_3tld" entries to the files, and all seems to be fine.
I did find that you had one 3TLD entry in your 2TLD file, which cause spamassassin --lint to complain: co(dot)at(dot)pn
Cheers!
Bill
On 3/3/10, Bill Landry bill@inetmsg.com wrote:
On 3/3/2010 12:42 AM, Jeff Chan wrote:
On 3/2/10, Bill Landry bill@inetmsg.com wrote:
On 3/2/2010 5:48 PM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
Hi!
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6335
that there are 2 new TLD files available for uses with SURBL: "two-level-tlds" and "three-level-tlds".
However, I am wondering where these files should be placed and if they need to be renamed and have .cf appended to them like the "90_2tld.cf" file URIBL supplies?
Thanks in advance for any guidance or feedback.
Yups. If you want to put them inside SpamAssassin you most likely can simply catch http://rulesemporium.com/rules/90_2tld.cf
Okay, but that really doesn't make sense, since there are different 2TLD and 3TLD domains listed in the 2 files available for download on the SURBL site. There must be some reason for these files being made available for download and hour sync from SURBL?
Bill
You may need to create new .cf files with our TLD lists. There may be an effort by SA to merge the TLD changes into their TLD data, but we have not heard back yet.
Did you also see the SURBL TLD announcement which has some references:
http://lists.surbl.org/pipermail/announce/2010-February/000202.html
No, but thanks for the link.
(Everyone reading this, please make sure you are signed up for the SURBL Announce mailing list. Message volume is very low at a few messages per year.)
I'll subscribe.
I added the two TLD files, added the appropriate "util_rb_2tld" "util_rb_3tld" entries to the files, and all seems to be fine.
I did find that you had one 3TLD entry in your 2TLD file, which cause spamassassin --lint to complain: co(dot)at(dot)pn
Thanks much Bill, The error has been corrected.