-----Original Message----- From: Joseph Brennan [mailto:brennan@columbia.edu] Sent: 2008-11-06 16:21 To: discuss@lists.surbl.org; SURBL Zones Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] [SURBL-Announce] SURBL Usage Policy change
At-- SURBL usage policy: http://www.surbl.org/usage-policy.html
I get very different pricing depending whether I input 80,000 users or 80000 users (same number, no comma).
Number of messages does not affect it.
At the price for 80,000 (sic) I have no objection at all. At the other price I'll really have to analyze how much we block with it. I'm not sure what conclusion I will reach.
I do not speak for SURBL in any way. I would say anyone who is thinking of not using it due to policy changes should discuss this with them OFFLIST. I believe this is not ment to hinder people using it, or even become filthy rich. Just to keep the darn thing running :) But thats just my opinion.
Jeff is good people ;)
--Chris
Wow!
I just looked at the difference. Use the comma!!!
B
----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Santerre" csanterre@MerchantsOverseas.com To: "'SURBL Discussion list'" discuss@lists.surbl.org; "SURBL Zones" zones@lists.surbl.org Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 2:46 PM Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] [SURBL-Announce] SURBL Usage Policy change
-----Original Message----- From: Joseph Brennan [mailto:brennan@columbia.edu] Sent: 2008-11-06 16:21 To: discuss@lists.surbl.org; SURBL Zones Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] [SURBL-Announce] SURBL Usage Policy change
At-- SURBL usage policy: http://www.surbl.org/usage-policy.html
I get very different pricing depending whether I input 80,000 users or 80000 users (same number, no comma).
Number of messages does not affect it.
At the price for 80,000 (sic) I have no objection at all. At the other price I'll really have to analyze how much we block with it. I'm not sure what conclusion I will reach.
I do not speak for SURBL in any way. I would say anyone who is thinking of not using it due to policy changes should discuss this with them OFFLIST. I believe this is not ment to hinder people using it, or even become filthy rich. Just to keep the darn thing running :) But thats just my opinion.
Jeff is good people ;)
--Chris _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.surbl.org http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
----- Original Message ----- From: "QQQQ" qqqq@usermail.com To: "SURBL Discussion list" discuss@lists.surbl.org; "SURBL Zones" zones@lists.surbl.org Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 11:20 PM Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] [SURBL-Announce] SURBL Usage Policy change
Wow!
I just looked at the difference. Use the comma!!!
Instead of ignoring punctuation, it's truncating anything after the comma.
All the best
Phil
_____________________________________________
Website Hosting from only £5.00 per month. www.medwayhosting.com - +44 (0)1634 856965 _____________________________________________
Digital & Traditional Printing, and much more www.medwayprint.com - +44 (0)1634 281199 _____________________________________________
On 11/6/08, Phil (Medway Hosting) phil@medwayhosting.com wrote:
Instead of ignoring punctuation, it's truncating anything after the comma.
Thanks much Phil.
FWIW I fixed my PCRE error and punctuation is now correctly discarded. I had a search pattern instead of the character class I intended. (I forgot the square brackets [] around the characters.)
Cheers,
Jeff C.
-
Chris Santerre -
Jeff Chan -
Phil (Medway Hosting) -
QQQQ