(I sent this again because I discovered that my original message when only to Raymond and not to the list)
Raymond,
Recall that I mentioned that I'm NOT a SpamAssassin user. Also, I am currently NOT using any Bayesian filtering... (although I do have plans to eventually add this as an additional layer of filtering).
(Before you laugh, I would say that the filtering that I do use is very comparable to SpamAssassin when looking at what how effective it is against those e-mails which make it past SURBL and RBL.)
Nevertheless, I can't answer your two questions because they are not applicable.
Thanks for trying to help! :)
Any other thoughts/suggestions?
Rob McEwen
PowerView Systems
rob@PowerViewSystems.com
(478) 475-9032
-----Original Message-----
From: Raymond Dijkxhoorn [mailto:raymond@prolocation.net]
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 9:08 AM
To: rob@pvsys.com; SURBL Discussion list
Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] RE: Pesky Pron Spam
Importance: High
Hi!
I have noticed some patterns in the e-mails. For example, they all
have three images stacked vertically. Therefore, I think that I should
be able to catch these with the right formulation of rules within my
linguistic filter.
You can find the raw contents of my most recent two of these as
follows:
What are the SA scores you got on these? Might tell much more. Could be
your bayesian filters are doing this.
Bye,
Raymond.
Hi!
Recall that I mentioned that I'm NOT a SpamAssassin user. Also, I am currently NOT using any Bayesian filtering... (although I do have plans eventually add this as an additional layer of filtering).
Ok, i overlooked that i think. :)
(Before you laugh, I would say that the filtering that I do use is very comparable to SpamAssassin when looking at what how effective it is against those e-mails which make it past SURBL and RBL.)
But obviously is doesnt work. I have a lot of those, with different txt, but the same URLs. The ones you mentioned are listed in 3 SURBL lists, you should be able to catch them up pretty easilly.
We only provide the lists, i guess you have to look on the 'thing' you are using whats going wrong.
;)
Bye, Raymond.
-
Raymond Dijkxhoorn -
Rob McEwen