Almost perfect. You have to follow RFC standards and name them either star wars or Simpsons Characters. Not ns1, ns2, ......
:)
--Chris
-----Original Message----- From: William C. Devine II [mailto:william@devine.net] Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 10:00 AM To: Jeff Chan; SURBL Discussion list Subject: RE: [SURBL-Discuss] Improved name server status page
You could keep a generic list of nameservers such as 'Server 1', 'Server 2', etc, which correlates to 'ns1', 'ns2', etc. It'd just add a level of obscurity and require just a little more of a monkey to figure out though.
william
-----Original Message----- From: Jeff Chan [mailto:jeffc@surbl.org] Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 6:40 AM To: SURBL Discuss Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Improved name server status page
On Tuesday, August 24, 2004, 6:32:44 AM, Chris Santerre wrote:
That is very cool! However do you think it is wise to make public the
IP's
of the servers?
Yeah that kind of raised some flags for me too, but the servers are easy enough to find, and the names of the servers are not unique due to the round robin.
For example e.surbl.org resolves to two different name servers.
So the only thing unique and used for the subdomains are their IP addresses. I suppose we could set up another set of aliases for them, but kind of don't want another set to maintain. (The old style ns1, ns2, etc. names remain but for BIND type servers for the parent zone. They have already diverged from the rbldnsd servers.)
Jeff C.
Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.surbl.org http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.surbl.org http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
-
Chris Santerre