X-Spam-Status: No, hits=5.0 required=10.0 tests=WS_URI_RBL=5
cellular4free . com
No hits from Google/NANAS
On Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 2:51:53 AM, Bitz Bitz wrote:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=5.0 required=10.0 tests=WS_URI_RBL=5
cellular4free . com
No hits from Google/NANAS
Domain 1.2 years old, no SBL hits.
Any WS guys know why this one got added?
Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."
On Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 3:05:23 AM, Jeff Chan wrote:
On Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 2:51:53 AM, Bitz Bitz wrote:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=5.0 required=10.0 tests=WS_URI_RBL=5
cellular4free . com
No hits from Google/NANAS
Domain 1.2 years old, no SBL hits.
Any WS guys know why this one got added?
Jeff C.
Can anyone with access to WS data sources tell us anything about this domain or why it was added? Otherwise we may need to whitelist it.
Bill, Chris, Raymond? Can you say where it came from?
Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."
Hi!
cellular4free . com
No hits from Google/NANAS
Domain 1.2 years old, no SBL hits.
Any WS guys know why this one got added?
Jeff C.
Can anyone with access to WS data sources tell us anything about this domain or why it was added? Otherwise we may need to whitelist it.
Bill, Chris, Raymond? Can you say where it came from?
Not here...
Bye, Raymond.
On Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 6:17:36 PM, Jeff Chan wrote:
On Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 3:05:23 AM, Jeff Chan wrote:
On Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 2:51:53 AM, Bitz Bitz wrote:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=5.0 required=10.0 tests=WS_URI_RBL=5
cellular4free . com
No hits from Google/NANAS
Domain 1.2 years old, no SBL hits.
Any WS guys know why this one got added?
Jeff C.
Can anyone with access to WS data sources tell us anything about this domain or why it was added? Otherwise we may need to whitelist it.
Bill, Chris, Raymond? Can you say where it came from?
Bill, do you have any more information about this domain?
Does anyone know anything about it? Have a spam? Have a ham? Did elves add it to WS?
Bitz, can you tell us why you think it's a false positive?
Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."
Jeff,
Well we have a customer who thinks he can get a free cellphone via celluar4free and was wondering why he's not getting any e-mails from them ;-)
I do quarantine all messages listed at *.surbl.org
Thanks, -b.
Jeff Chan wrote:
On Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 6:17:36 PM, Jeff Chan wrote:
On Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 3:05:23 AM, Jeff Chan wrote:
On Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 2:51:53 AM, Bitz Bitz wrote:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=5.0 required=10.0 tests=WS_URI_RBL=5
cellular4free . com
No hits from Google/NANAS
Domain 1.2 years old, no SBL hits.
Any WS guys know why this one got added?
Jeff C.
Can anyone with access to WS data sources tell us anything about this domain or why it was added? Otherwise we may need to whitelist it.
Bill, Chris, Raymond? Can you say where it came from?
Bill, do you have any more information about this domain?
Does anyone know anything about it? Have a spam? Have a ham? Did elves add it to WS?
Bitz, can you tell us why you think it's a false positive?
Jeff C.
"If it appears in hams, then don't list it."
Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.surbl.org http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
On Saturday, October 2, 2004, 2:37:50 AM, Bitz Bitz wrote:
Jeff,
Well we have a customer who thinks he can get a free cellphone via celluar4free and was wondering why he's not getting any e-mails from them ;-)
I do quarantine all messages listed at *.surbl.org
Thanks, -b.
Thanks for the additional info.
OK I can now see how this one is getting onto the list:
/home/wstearns/black-wstearns-2004-07:cellular4free.com /home/wstearns/black-wstearns-200406:cellular4free.com /home/wstearns/black-wstearns-hand-checked:cellular4free.com /home/wstearns/black-wstearns-sa-blacklist.200406281446.domains:cellular4free.com
Which suggests it's one Bill added or checked by hand.
Bill do you have any original spam on this? Their content obviously looks very spammy, but that doesn't necessarily mean they send it via spam.
Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."