Hi,
I just wanted to report a false positive with the domain, seonetworker.com.
This domain is owned by my company, Attraction Marketing Formula, LLC. ( attractionmarketingformula.com)
It's a new domain, which is why it may have raised a redflag.
A request for removal was sent, (ST #2452779).
seonetworker.com is a training site for the home business industry and the owner information is public, which can be found with a 'whois' search.
I've sent multiple request via the recommended channels with no response, and found this list and read that part of it's function is to report false positives.
I look forward to contributing further.
Regards, Fernando Ceballos & Raymond Fong
This is not the appropriate place to request removals. Please answer the questions Outblaze already asked.
On 12/23/08, Ferny Ceballos fernando.ceballos@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I just wanted to report a false positive with the domain, seonetworker.com.
This domain is owned by my company, Attraction Marketing Formula, LLC. ( attractionmarketingformula.com)
It's a new domain, which is why it may have raised a redflag.
A request for removal was sent, (ST #2452779).
seonetworker.com is a training site for the home business industry and the owner information is public, which can be found with a 'whois' search.
I've sent multiple request via the recommended channels with no response, and found this list and read that part of it's function is to report false positives.
I look forward to contributing further.
Regards, Fernando Ceballos & Raymond Fong _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.surbl.org http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
By the way, you are incorrect in saying there has been no response. There have been at least a dozen messages between you and Outblaze in regards to your removal request. You should answer their questions.
On 24.12.08 02:05, SURBL Role wrote:
By the way, you are incorrect in saying there has been no response. There have been at least a dozen messages between you and Outblaze in regards to your removal request. You should answer their questions.
those questions were apparently catched by spam filter ...
On 12/26/08, Matus UHLAR - fantomas uhlar@fantomas.sk wrote:
On 24.12.08 02:05, SURBL Role wrote:
By the way, you are incorrect in saying there has been no response. There have been at least a dozen messages between you and Outblaze in regards to your removal request. You should answer their questions.
those questions were apparently catched by spam filter ...
The questions were not posted to the discussion list (here). They were private messages on the removal email alias.
On 26.12.08 11:49, SURBL Role wrote:
On 12/26/08, Matus UHLAR - fantomas uhlar@fantomas.sk wrote:
On 24.12.08 02:05, SURBL Role wrote:
By the way, you are incorrect in saying there has been no response. There have been at least a dozen messages between you and Outblaze in regards to your removal request. You should answer their questions.
those questions were apparently catched by spam filter ...
The questions were not posted to the discussion list (here). They were private messages on the removal email alias.
I've meant, your questions were probably catched by his spam filter so he didn't get them
On 12/26/08, Matus UHLAR - fantomas uhlar@fantomas.sk wrote:
On 26.12.08 11:49, SURBL Role wrote:
On 12/26/08, Matus UHLAR - fantomas uhlar@fantomas.sk wrote:
On 24.12.08 02:05, SURBL Role wrote:
By the way, you are incorrect in saying there has been no response. There have been at least a dozen messages between you and Outblaze in regards to your removal request. You should answer their questions.
those questions were apparently catched by spam filter ...
The questions were not posted to the discussion list (here). They were private messages on the removal email alias.
I've meant, your questions were probably catched by his spam filter so he didn't get them
They replied to the questions privately, so it would seem they got them.
Hi!
This is not the appropriate place to request removals. Please answer the questions Outblaze already asked.
More posting here about domain removal requests will result in termination of your posting rights here. Whitelist requests will not be talked over in public. They have to be adressed to the whitelist people and not here.
There have been various responsed on that list to you. You do not seem to provide the right information so we cannot proceed there.
Thread closed.
Bye, Raymond.
On 12/23/08, Ferny Ceballos fernando.ceballos@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I just wanted to report a false positive with the domain, seonetworker.com.
This domain is owned by my company, Attraction Marketing Formula, LLC. ( attractionmarketingformula.com)
It's a new domain, which is why it may have raised a redflag.
A request for removal was sent, (ST #2452779).
seonetworker.com is a training site for the home business industry and the owner information is public, which can be found with a 'whois' search.
I've sent multiple request via the recommended channels with no response, and found this list and read that part of it's function is to report false positives.
I look forward to contributing further.
Regards, Fernando Ceballos & Raymond Fong _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.surbl.org http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This is not the appropriate place to request removals. Please answer the questions Outblaze already asked. - Show quoted text -
On 12/23/08, Ferny Ceballos fernando.ceballos@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I just wanted to report a false positive with the domain, seonetworker.com.
This domain is owned by my company, Attraction Marketing Formula, LLC. ( attractionmarketingformula.com)
It's a new domain, which is why it may have raised a redflag.
A request for removal was sent, (ST #2452779).
seonetworker.com is a training site for the home business industry and the owner information is public, which can be found with a 'whois' search.
I've sent multiple request via the recommended channels with no response, and found this list and read that part of it's function is to report false positives.
I look forward to contributing further.
Regards, Fernando Ceballos & Raymond Fong
This is not an appropriate place to request removals. Please answer the questions Outblaze already asked you privately.
By the way, you are incorrect in saying there has been no response. There have been more than a dozen messages between your Raymond Fong and Outblaze in regards to your removal request.
-
Ferny Ceballos -
Matus UHLAR - fantomas -
Raymond Dijkxhoorn -
SURBL Role