Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 19:19:01 +0200 (CEST) From: Raymond Dijkxhoorn raymond@prolocation.net Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Question re: integration with SpamAssassin 3.0 To: SURBL Discussion list discuss@lists.surbl.org Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.61.0409261916300.22651@mailbox.prolocation.net Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed

Hi!

...

I have been using the SURBL plugin with SA 2.64 successfully and have just upgraded SA to 3.0. In the docs it states that it is best to use multi.surbl.org with 3.0. Is this configured by default somewhere or do I need to add the rule to local.cf??

This is enabled by default, of you have modules like Net::DNS installed.

...

I have been watching the spam processed so far this morning and I am getting hits on the lists I had configured with 2.64 but not multi which is why I ask.

You still see the hits on the seperate lists.

Thy show up like: URIBL_WS_SURBL and URIBL_OB_SURBL for example.

...

If I do need to add the rule, what is the exact syntax to use for 3.0??

No need to do that.

...

My apologies if this has been covered before - my searches came up pretty empty.

A grep inside your rules dir would have told ;)

25_uribl.cf:urirhssub URIBL_SC_SURBL multi.surbl.org. A 2 25_uribl.cf:urirhssub URIBL_WS_SURBL multi.surbl.org. A 4 25_uribl.cf:urirhssub URIBL_PH_SURBL multi.surbl.org. A 8 25_uribl.cf:urirhssub URIBL_OB_SURBL multi.surbl.org. A 16 25_uribl.cf:urirhssub URIBL_AB_SURBL multi.surbl.org. A 32

Bye, Raymond.

---

While it's true that the rules are there, don't we have to add scores to local.cf? (I upgraded this AM, too).

Regards, Alden