Hi these three urls weren't listed in multi.surbl.org at 5:00 AM GMT.
wonderfulcompressorwell.com bobtangofunny.com wonderfulcomplimentwell.com
On Wednesday, May 18, 2005, 10:05:58 PM, Rakesh Rakesh wrote:
Hi these three urls weren't listed in multi.surbl.org at 5:00 AM GMT.
wonderfulcompressorwell.com bobtangofunny.com wonderfulcomplimentwell.com
Thanks for those. I checked and manually blacklisted them.
Cheers,
Jeff C. -- Don't harm innocent bystanders.
On Wednesday, May 18, 2005, 10:41:47 PM, Brett Cove wrote:
Rakesh wrote:
Hi these three urls weren't listed in multi.surbl.org at 5:00 AM GMT.
wonderfulcompressorwell.com bobtangofunny.com wonderfulcomplimentwell.com
Is this Ralsky wading into the rolex spam?
It comes up Camargo and China Railway Telecommunications Center on SpamHaus. Dunno if they and Ralsky work together.
http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL25949 http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL25950
http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL23091 http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL21980 http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL25609
Jeff C. -- Don't harm innocent bystanders.
On Thursday, May 19, 2005, 3:45:33 AM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
Hi!
Hi these three urls weren't listed in multi.surbl.org at 5:00 AM GMT.
wonderfulcompressorwell.com bobtangofunny.com
<cut>
So submit them with the webform ... :) Together with the actual spams.
Thanks, Raymond.
Are the form submissions still getting checked and added? If so, then yes, please use. Would someone please let us know?
Jeff C. -- Don't harm innocent bystanders.
Hi!
<cut>
So submit them with the webform ... :) Together with the actual spams.
Are the form submissions still getting checked and added? If so, then yes, please use. Would someone please let us know?
Naturally. I get a load of those daily, so do the others on that list. And yes they are handled... why? Nothing changed there :)
Bye, Raymond.
On Thursday, May 19, 2005, 5:11:31 AM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
So submit them with the webform ... :) Together with the actual spams.
Are the form submissions still getting checked and added? If so, then yes, please use. Would someone please let us know?
Naturally. I get a load of those daily, so do the others on that list. And yes they are handled... why? Nothing changed there :)
Thank much Raymond and all! (The reason I asked is because Chris couldn't answer this earlier.)
Jeff C. -- Don't harm innocent bystanders.
Jeff Chan wrote:
On Thursday, May 19, 2005, 5:11:31 AM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
So submit them with the webform ... :) Together with the actual spams.
Are the form submissions still getting checked and added? If so, then yes, please use. Would someone please let us know?
Naturally. I get a load of those daily, so do the others on that list. And yes they are handled... why? Nothing changed there :)
Thank much Raymond and all! (The reason I asked is because Chris couldn't answer this earlier.)
Jeff,
I still get those submitted through the webform... granted a lot of it being submitted lately is very unlikely to ever see a list.. folks are still reporting those "German spams" ::sigh::
And I can't stress enough to INCLUDE A SAMPLE AND ANY SA SCORING!
I have found a lot that are on like ob.surbl.org or one of the other surbl.org lists so those I don't even add to ws.surbl.org since they're all miced together into multi.
-Doc
----- Original Message ----- From: "Doc Schneider" maddoc@maddoc.net
Jeff Chan wrote:
On Thursday, May 19, 2005, 5:11:31 AM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
So submit them with the webform ... :) Together with the actual spams.
Are the form submissions still getting checked and added? If so, then yes, please use. Would someone please let us know?
Naturally. I get a load of those daily, so do the others on that list. And yes they are handled... why? Nothing changed there :)
Thank much Raymond and all! (The reason I asked is because Chris couldn't answer this earlier.)
Jeff,
I still get those submitted through the webform... granted a lot of it being submitted lately is very unlikely to ever see a list.. folks are still reporting those "German spams" ::sigh::
And I can't stress enough to INCLUDE A SAMPLE AND ANY SA SCORING!
I have found a lot that are on like ob.surbl.org or one of the other surbl.org lists so those I don't even add to ws.surbl.org since they're all miced together into multi.
Except that the more lists the URI shows up on, the higher the score that gets assigned to the message and the more likely it will exceed the spam threshold.
Bill
On Thursday, May 19, 2005, 10:12:15 AM, Bill Landry wrote:
From: "Doc Schneider" maddoc@maddoc.net
I still get those submitted through the webform... granted a lot of it being submitted lately is very unlikely to ever see a list.. folks are still reporting those "German spams" ::sigh::
And I can't stress enough to INCLUDE A SAMPLE AND ANY SA SCORING!
I have found a lot that are on like ob.surbl.org or one of the other surbl.org lists so those I don't even add to ws.surbl.org since they're all miced together into multi.
Except that the more lists the URI shows up on, the higher the score that gets assigned to the message and the more likely it will exceed the spam threshold.
Yeah, I'd say it's ok to list public submissions on the WS list, even if they're already on other SURBLs. That helps WS track the public submissions better.
Jeff C. -- Don't harm innocent bystanders.
-
Bill Landry -
Brett Cove -
Doc Schneider -
Jeff Chan -
Rakesh -
Raymond Dijkxhoorn