-----Original Message----- From: jm@jmason.org [mailto:jm@jmason.org] Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 5:17 PM To: Raymond Dijkxhoorn Cc: Alex Broens; users-return-15498-sa-list=alexb.ch@spamassassin.apache.org; SURBL Discussion list (E-mail); Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) Subject: Re: Start an IP list to block?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Raymond Dijkxhoorn writes:
Hi!
Chris, Raymond ,
I went thru a random few of these and they're were listed
at Spamhaus.
Using spamhaus at SMTP level or SA doing RBL lookups would
have caught and
stopped them... Spamcop probably has quite a few of them
listed as well
No, that wont work. The spams are sended in via
trojans/proxys only the
websites are static. SOME are blocked with DSBL and so but
most of the
time they start a spamrun with a fresh set it seems.
So yes, they are inside spamhaus, but only the websites,
didnt see mails
sended out from there (yet).
Are their NS records listed in the SBL?
- --j.
No, but extremely easy to add. However....I'm not sure Jeff would like that. Would have to be a seperate list.
-_Chris
On Thursday, September 9, 2004, 2:26:37 PM, Chris Santerre wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: jm@jmason.org [mailto:jm@jmason.org] Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 5:17 PM To: Raymond Dijkxhoorn Cc: Alex Broens; users-return-15498-sa-list=alexb.ch@spamassassin.apache.org; SURBL Discussion list (E-mail); Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) Subject: Re: Start an IP list to block?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Raymond Dijkxhoorn writes:
Hi!
Chris, Raymond ,
I went thru a random few of these and they're were listed
at Spamhaus.
Using spamhaus at SMTP level or SA doing RBL lookups would
have caught and
stopped them... Spamcop probably has quite a few of them
listed as well
No, that wont work. The spams are sended in via
trojans/proxys only the
websites are static. SOME are blocked with DSBL and so but
most of the
time they start a spamrun with a fresh set it seems.
So yes, they are inside spamhaus, but only the websites,
didnt see mails
sended out from there (yet).
Are their NS records listed in the SBL?
- --j.
No, but extremely easy to add. However....I'm not sure Jeff would like that. Would have to be a seperate list.
-_Chris
ADD THEM TO SBL. DO NOT ADD THEM TO SURBL.
Holy fsck guys! We have a good thing going here. We're put a lot of work into it so far, and it's working pretty well. Let's not tear apart the SURBL project, OK?
Give me a chance to make some improvements in the next version of the data engine. It will take into account resolved IPs and get new domains onto the lists sooner.
Jeff C.
Hi!
ADD THEM TO SBL. DO NOT ADD THEM TO SURBL.
kay!
Holy fsck guys! We have a good thing going here. We're put a lot of work into it so far, and it's working pretty well. Let's not tear apart the SURBL project, OK?
Give me a chance to make some improvements in the next version of the data engine. It will take into account resolved IPs and get new domains onto the lists sooner.
Stop mailing, start coding ;)
Bye, Raymond.
On Thursday, September 9, 2004, 3:28:27 PM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
Holy fsck guys! We have a good thing going here. We're put a lot of work into it so far, and it's working pretty well. Let's not tear apart the SURBL project, OK?
Give me a chance to make some improvements in the next version of the data engine. It will take into account resolved IPs and get new domains onto the lists sooner.
Stop mailing, start coding ;)
Stop bugging! ;-)
Jeff C.
-
Chris Santerre -
Jeff Chan -
Raymond Dijkxhoorn