-----Original Message----- From: Raymond Dijkxhoorn [mailto:raymond@prolocation.net] Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 5:32 AM To: Jeff Chan; SURBL Discussion list Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Fwd: Re: ANTI-SURBL technique used by spammer
Hi!
I brought it up due to the possible bad uses of this
technology. It's
possible for a spammer to use this service for free
bandwidth for images and
other content (flash, etc).
This is just one of those things to hold on to and keep an
eye out for, if
the word get's out, the spammers might try and abuse it.
From the message
boards, most people don't care what it's used for, except
those using 40 GB
per day in illegal movie downloads cause they choose to be a mirror.
Are you aware of http://freecache.org ? Take a look here if not: http://slashdot.org/articles/04/05/12/1635205.shtml?tid=126&tid=95 Thanks!
We might tell them about SURBL and ask to implement caching only for non listed domains. Others implemented things like that allready. Jeff, can you take that actionpoint?
Bye, Raymond.
I think that is a fantastic idea! They want there service to be great. It can't be if they are blacklisted. I second the motion to contact them. Can't hurt.
--Chris
Hi!
We might tell them about SURBL and ask to implement caching listed domains. Others implemented things like that allready. you take that actionpoint?
I think that is a fantastic idea! They want there service to be great. It can't be if they are blacklisted. I second the motion to contact them. Can't hurt.
Jeff allready is mailing with them and suggested using SURBL, lets see.
Bye, Raymond.
-
Chris Santerre -
Raymond Dijkxhoorn