-----Original Message----- From: Jeff Chan [mailto:jeffc@surbl.org] Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 4:09 AM To: SURBL Discuss Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] RFC: SURBL flyer
On Thursday, July 29, 2004, 12:55:10 AM, John Andersen wrote:
On Tuesday 27 July 2004 12:58 am, Jeff Chan wrote:
On Tuesday, July 27, 2004, 1:36:53 AM, Daniel Kleinsinger wrote:
http://mailscanner.info MailScanner doesn't include or depend on SA (without SA
one can still
check for viruses and do old fashioned RBL lookups), but
the only way to
have MailScanner check SURBLs is to utilize its ability
to call SA 2.63
- SpamCopURI or SA 3.0.
OK Thanks for that. I've taken MailScanner off the flyer.
http://www.surbl.org/flyer.html
Does anyone have any other comments for me?
Jeff C.
Yeah... SURBLs don't BLOCK anything. Blocking is up to the user. That point should be made. Surprisingly, lots of people get bent out of shape if you use the word BLOCK and EMAIL in the same sentence.
True, but I never said SURBLs block anything. I said: "SURBLs... are used to block messages." Technically SURBLs don't block anything. Programs that use SURBLs do the blocking....
Jeff C.
It needs an attention grabber. How about these titles:
Sexy Underwear Really Black Lace (SURBL) She Used Really Big Lemons (SURBL) Some United Redheads Bring Love (SURBL) Simultaneous Ugly Rats Bite Leroy (SURBL)
Sorry the medicine is kicking in........
--Chris
-
Chris Santerre