[forwarded response from announce list]
Chris Santerre wrote:
The ONLY complaint anyone ever had with Stearn's list was the overhead. With it setup this way, there is no stopping him!! :)
Great job by Bill and Jeff!
--Chris (Yeah I know,....the list.) :-)
[snip]
Wow, I implemented this yesterday and, after about 18 hours, this rule was #4 in my list of most-used rules! Good job, guys!
[snap]
I'm getting most excellent spam catching here. For a while was only catching 70-80% but now am catchng closer to 95+% Still have the odd one slipping through.
Which reminds me I need to grab a new bigevil 8*)
And even though Bill Stearns list does take a bit f overhead I am still using it and a whole slug of other rules as well as wc.surbl.org. But the surbl is the one that is now doing the most catching.
-Doc
Hi!
I'm getting most excellent spam catching here. For a while was only catching 70-80% but now am catchng closer to 95+% Still have the odd one slipping through.
Which reminds me I need to grab a new bigevil 8*)
And even though Bill Stearns list does take a bit f overhead I am still using it and a whole slug of other rules as well as wc.surbl.org. But the surbl is the one that is now doing the most catching.
Why not use the be.surbl.org ? :))
Bye, Raymond.
On Wednesday, April 21, 2004, 4:37:34 AM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
Hi!
I'm getting most excellent spam catching here. For a while was only catching 70-80% but now am catchng closer to 95+% Still have the odd one slipping through.
Which reminds me I need to grab a new bigevil 8*)
And even though Bill Stearns list does take a bit f overhead I am still using it and a whole slug of other rules as well as wc.surbl.org. But the surbl is the one that is now doing the most catching.
Why not use the be.surbl.org ? :))
We have not released BE as an SURBL yet. Need to get those couple questions answered about TXT and particularly TTLs.
(Also need to let our name servers know to secondary it, etc. For that matter I have not set up delegation yet.)
Jeff C.
Hi!
Why not use the be.surbl.org ? :))
We have not released BE as an SURBL yet. Need to get those couple questions answered about TXT and particularly TTLs.
(Also need to let our name servers know to secondary it, etc. For that matter I have not set up delegation yet.)
I loaded it on my NS allready :)
Bye, Raymond.
Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
I loaded it on my NS allready :)
Me too :-)
David
On Wednesday, April 21, 2004, 4:54:31 AM, David Coulson wrote:
Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
I loaded it on my NS allready :)
Me too :-)
LOL!!!
I guess I should take 30 seconds and set up delegation then....
Jeff C.
On Wednesday, April 21, 2004, 4:50:14 AM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
Why not use the be.surbl.org ? :))
We have not released BE as an SURBL yet. Need to get those couple questions answered about TXT and particularly TTLs.
(Also need to let our name servers know to secondary it, etc. For that matter I have not set up delegation yet.)
I loaded it on my NS allready :)
Hehe, I didn't even have it updating; I just added that since I figured you were probably already doing that. :-)
But I still want to get the time and message feedback from the authors...
Jeff C.
-
David Coulson -
Doc Schneider -
Jeff Chan -
Raymond Dijkxhoorn