Discuss

discuss@lists.surbl.org

1862 discussions

Start a nNew thread

Possible FP
by Bitz 02 Oct '04

02 Oct '04

X-Spam-Status: No, hits=5.0 required=10.0 tests=WS_URI_RBL=5 cellular4free . com No hits from Google/NANAS

3 6

419 for school???
by Chris Santerre 02 Oct '04

02 Oct '04

I don't get his one at all!!! WTH??? I'm CC'ing to SURBL because look at the MX for this domain! uniprepacademy.com dns_mx: neti-outblaze-com.mr.outblaze.com neti-outblaze-com-bk.mr.outblaze.com I know it didn't come form that domain, but the advertised part of this email points to that domain. I'm guessing this is just an email to try to harvest addresses from people who reply? ____________________________________________________________ Received: from hotmail.com (bay19-f20.bay19.hotmail.com [64.4.53.70]) by moglobal.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id i91FRj7K002969 for <csanterre(a)MERCHANTSOVERSEAS.COM>; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 11:27:49 -0400 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 07:50:06 -0700 Received: from 216.139.176.61 by by19fd.bay19.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 14:49:01 GMT X-Originating-IP: [216.139.176.61] X-Originating-Email: [estherekii17(a)hotmail.com] X-Sender: estherekii17(a)hotmail.com Reply-To: esthereki17(a)indiatimes.com From: "Esther Eki" <estherekii17(a)hotmail.com> Bcc: Subject: Greeting to you Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 09:49:01 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: <BAY19-F20hqiTPuUMMA00032335(a)hotmail.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Oct 2004 14:50:06.0052 (UTC) FILETIME=[F09E5240:01C4A7C5] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.0 (2004-09-13) on mail X-Spam-Level: **** X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.3 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_SBL,SARE_TOCC_NONE,SARE_TOWRITE autolearn=disabled version=3.0.0 Hello, I am happy to write you this letter, to me it took a lot of time before I decided to write you, I am just 17 years old and I lost both parents in a ghastly motor accident last year and since then, I have been staying with my Aunty, but of recent she has been persuading me to go into prostitution rather than going to school to further my education. But I dissappointed her by refusing not to go into prostitution and that made her not to assist me in obtain my school's scholarship , I begged her for her assistance so I can resume school, but she refused and said that would be the punishment for me to disobey her, now I am in a situation for me to obey her but I don't want to, the only way for me to free my self from this situation, is for me to be able to pay my school fees so that I will leave her house, and I am also applying for a scholarship that would help me with my tuition, accomodation and all the expenses that I would need to pay while in school. Because by the time I my school fees, I will move away from her house and resume school and start staying in the school's dormitory and that would keep her away from me, and I won't have to be persuaded to go into such bad thing, presently I am in my final year at University Preparatory Academy, Jos, Plateau State and all fees goes directly to the school. But the problem I am having now is how do I get my school fees paid, and thats the reason I decided to write you for your assistance, someone that would take me as a sister and give me good advise and support in prayers and I am also praying to God to bless me, and thats while I decided to write you, to know if you can contact the school on my behalf and also help me beg them for the scholarship which I applied for, so I can resume school as soon as possible, God bless you and your humble family. Please if you want to contact the school, this is the address The Principal University Preparatory Academy Jos Pleateau State principal(a)uniprepacademy.com I hope to hear from you soon. Yours Esther Eki

4 3

Postfix pre-queue filter
by Yves Junqueira 01 Oct '04

01 Oct '04

Hi, I've just uploaded to sourceforge the first version of a spamvertised URIs pre-queue filter for Postfix. It's simple and effective. It will analyse the message before it enters the queue and, in case of a listed url, it will REJECT the message and the sending client will take the proper actions. http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/pf-aux/suriproxy-0.8.tar.gz?download See the readme file for instructions. I can't assure how stable it is at the momment, that's why I am asking some feedback. What do you think? -- Yves Junqueira http://www.lynx.com.br

3 3

Help classify quickinspirations.com
by Chris Santerre 01 Oct '04

01 Oct '04

quickinspirations.com Thoughts on this guy? 48 NANAS hits. Listed in dnsbl.njabl.org Didn't we already classify this? I wonder if we can get a crossref lookup of the global whitelist, so we can see what has already been whitelisted. I belive this is a spammer in sheeps clothing. But it fools people into signing up for a stupid inspiration newsletter. But the subjects of the newsletter are stuff like: Subject: Get a Credit Report Instantly! Then a inspiration quote, then a big ad. I think we may see more of this in the future. I think it is a UC candidate. Do we have enough listed in UC for testing yet? Chris Santerre System Admin and SARE Ninja http://www.rulesemporium.com http://www.surbl.org 'It is not the strongest of the species that survives, not the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.' Charles Darwin

8 21

RE: [SURBL-Discuss] Help classify quickinspirations.com
by Chris Santerre 01 Oct '04

01 Oct '04

>-----Original Message----- >From: Patrik Nilsson [mailto:patrik@patrik.com] >Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 4:55 PM >To: SURBL Discussion list >Subject: RE: [SURBL-Discuss] Help classify quickinspirations.com > > >At 09:25 2004-09-30 -0700, Bret Miller wrote: >> > quickinspirations.com >> >>When this one came up here, every person who received it classified it >>as spam when I asked and so it remains that in my mind. > >And I still haven't seen any response actually arguing a real >reason why >quickinspirations.com should be whitelisted. > >We're not just whitelisting domains because someone, who doesn't even >bother to argue why, asks us to, do we? > >"This is reported as spam, looks like spam and smells like >spam, but we >will whitelist it just because it might be caught by other >antispam systems >anyway" isn't a very convincing argument. > ^LOL^ Oh I'm not comenting in that one ;) I'll let Jeff explain it, because I still don't understand this one. --Chris

3 2

RE: [SURBL-Discuss] 419 for school???
by Chris Santerre 01 Oct '04

01 Oct '04

>-----Original Message----- >From: Jeff Chan [mailto:jeffc@surbl.org] >Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 12:20 PM >To: SURBL Discussion list >Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] 419 for school??? > > >On Friday, October 1, 2004, 9:11:29 AM, Chris Santerre wrote: >> I don't get his one at all!!! WTH??? > >> I'm CC'ing to SURBL because look at the MX for this domain! > >> uniprepacademy.com dns_mx: >> neti-outblaze-com.mr.outblaze.com >> neti-outblaze-com-bk.mr.outblaze.com > >> I know it didn't come form that domain, but the advertised >part of this >> email points to that domain. I'm guessing this is just an >email to try to >> harvest addresses from people who reply? > >Harvest or Joe Job are always possible. > > >You may want to forward to postmaster(a)outblaze.com > >They don't put up with crud and will smack hard any abusers. > >Worst case they send Chris "The Leg Breaker" Santerre after >them. ;-) > I just sent it to them. What can I say, 6 foot, 235+ pounds, in an all out sprint on the ice..... I'd be glad for any spammer to be on the ice with me ;) --Chris (Come on ref, I hardly elbowed him at all!)

1 0

Help - Domain Age
by David Hooton 01 Oct '04

01 Oct '04

Hi All, I am trying to determine the age of goracer.de can anyone help, standard whois shown nothing of use. -- Regards, David Hooton

4 4

stopping ds.surbl.org service
by Jeff Chan 01 Oct '04

01 Oct '04

ds.surbl.org was an experimental list which is no longer getting any hits. We were serving it on a few name servers as a separate test list. I'd like to shut it down. Does anyone have any comments about doing that? If in future the folks behind the data are able to make a slice of it that only has pure spammers, then perhaps we may use it, but they don't appear to be moving in that direction currently. Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."

3 5

RE: [SURBL-Discuss] Help classify quickinspirations.com
by Chris Santerre 01 Oct '04

01 Oct '04

>-----Original Message----- >From: Jeff Chan [mailto:jeffc@surbl.org] >Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 12:54 AM >To: 'SURBL Discussion list' >Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Help classify quickinspirations.com > > >On Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 7:34:53 PM, Jeff Chan wrote: >> Most of these sites have open subscription forms, which invites >> abuse. If they have any kind of incentive programs for >> "affiliates" or anything like that, then that plus open >> subscriptions would *beg* for abuse. > >> That said, SBL does not list quickinspirations.com name servers >> or web site, etc. But NJABL does, and so do some others. > >OK I took a look at the NANAS hits, and all quickinspirations >mail seems to be sent from the same /27: > >64.37.73.212 64.37.73.221 64.37.73.218 64.37.73.214 >64.37.73.211 64.37.73.217 ... > >So if you block 64.37.73.192/27 or RBL it, ***you'll probably >never see any mail from quickinspirations ever again***. And anyone else who might be hosted on thos servers. :) > >Since these can be trivially blocked using regular RBLs or access >lists these probably aren't great SURBL candidates to begin with. > Trivial yes, but some people may prefer to use SURBL for this as it is 'safer' because it only blocks based on the domain. You yourself have said this about IPs. >The same cannot be said of spammers using zombies. Yes, but we are targeting spammers, not just spammers using zombies :) I'm wondering if we relist it, how long it would be until we heard someone complain. I'm only making this kind of a big deal because I think we will see this method grow. Hell what is to stop the spammer from getting his sister to complain to us that she signed up for this newsletter and it needs to be whitelisted? Something to consider is weighting the whitelist requests for domains that don't feel right like this one. One request for a domain like this may not cut the mustard. 3...OK. --Chris

3 3

RE: [SPAM-TAG] [SURBL-Discuss] Spammer threatening to suesingle4y ou.net
by Chris Santerre 01 Oct '04

01 Oct '04

>-----Original Message----- >From: Jeff Chan [mailto:jeffc@surbl.org] >Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2004 11:50 PM >To: SURBL Discuss >Subject: Re: [SPAM-TAG] [SURBL-Discuss] Spammer threatening to >suesingle4you.net > > >On Sunday, September 26, 2004, 8:35:40 PM, Joe Wein wrote: >> "Jeff Chan" <jeffc(a)surbl.org> >>> But that's not the question. The question is: does the domain >>> have legitimate uses. If so we shouldn't list it. We should not >>> list domains that have legitimate uses, even if they do send >>> in some spam. > >> Hi Jeff, > >> the latest emails from Mr. Schiffer were much more friendly >in tone. He also >> admitted that he was only bluffing when he talked about >legal action, as he >> really does not have any money for that. > >> I have removed his listing and let him know about that. I >hope he learnt >> something from it. > >> I probably wouldn't have removed the domain without your >reminder. Looking >> at this case I realise how difficult it really is for >submitters *not* to >> list spammers who may have some legitimate uses. > >> Joe > >Thanks Joe. Hopefully he's learned his lesson. > What the hell?? I just read this whole thread! I would not have taken this guy off! No way in hell!!!!! Ray, add this yahoo to UC please! The domain is brand new, sends spam, and screams about getting listed! How the hell can he be legit! Did you guys read the NANAS listings that showed his wonderful emails? These are just the ones reported. He 'purchased' a list. So none of these were opt in. This is not the last we will hear of this guy. I think taking him off is a mistake. And IF he does it again, I'll report his a$$ to every RBL I can find, simply because you guys removed this idiot. --Chris (Jaded, fed up, and tired of the BS.)

7 13

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss