-----Original Message----- From: Jeff Chan [mailto:jeffc@surbl.org] Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 8:18 PM To: Frank Ellermann Cc: discuss@lists.surbl.org Subject: Re: [SPAM-TAG] [SURBL-Discuss] Spammer threatening to suesingle4y ou.net

On Monday, September 27, 2004, 5:12:16 PM, Frank Ellermann wrote:

...

Jeff Chan wrote:

...

...

"A. Add domains that appear only in spam. Do not add any domains that appear in ham."

...

As an absolute rule that won't work, because the criminal spammer talks with his rogue registrar in "ham".

I don't consider spammer's messages to be ham. Only ham from legitimate people (non-spammers) is ordinary ham.

Jeff C.

"If it appears in hams, then don't list it."

Oh yeah single4you.net is realy legit.... and I'm the queen of England. Their site is back up, with personal ads that show picts of people. Too bad one of the pics is snoop dog, and another is Conan the Barbarian!!

The only basis we still have is this guys word that he is legit. Are we going to whitelist everyone who simply asks to be whitelisted? Yes or No?

--Chris